🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.